Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 17:13
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Thank you.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Aaron Judge's 469-Foot Home Run in Kansas City Left Baseball World in Disbelief - Sports Illustrated
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Which Bibles can one read and be confident they are reading the inerrant word of God?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Just in the last 5 years:
—— which songs do certain kuorans remind you of?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Microsoft Retires Legendary 'Blue Screen of Death' After 40 Years of Frowny Faces - CNET
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Looks Like Ye and Bianca Censori Are Going Strong - The Cut
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What’s next?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Physicists Propose Cheaper Alternative to Particle Colliders: Supermassive Black Holes - Gizmodo
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Man accused of writing Trump assassination letters was framed, officials say - BBC